
Abstract
Glass cliffs describe situations in which women are promoted to
executive roles in declining organizations. To explain them, some
authors suggest that people tend to "think crisis-think female".
However, the root cause of this association remains elusive. Using
several subfields of evolutionary theory, we argue that biology and
culture have shaped the perception of women as being more empathic than
men and, consequently, as capable of quelling certain crises. Some
crises are more intense than others and, whereas some brew within
organizations, others originate from the external environment. We
therefore propose that women will be selected to lead whenever a crisis
is minimal to moderate and stems primarily from within the organization.
Men, on the other hand, will be chosen as leaders whenever the crisis
threatens the very existence of the firm and its source is an external
threat. Leadership is a highly stressful experience, and even more so
when leaders must scale glass cliffs. It is imperative that we
understand what gives rise to them not only because they place women and
potentially other minorities in positions where the likelihood of
failure is high, but also because they help propagate stereotypes that
undermine their true leadership ability.
Source: John Vongas and Raghid Hajj, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01751/full
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.