While I do agree on the previous definition, sometimes art just doesn't make sense. I don't understand the value of old paintings or modern paintings, why would it's value be based on the artists themselves? If it's something that anyone can replicate and give it a "meaning", shouldn't it be considered art as well? So in my humble opinion, as long as it's enjoyable and brings emotion to somebody and not bound to anyone behind it, it can be considered as "art".
