Having understood what EFM is and its limitations, here you will learn about Behavioural Finance Theory and its role in investment decisions. What are the main effects of Behavioural Finance Theory on investors' decisions?
Normality Test
Statistical Treatment
The study analyzed the collected data via Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS V.17) to achieve the objectives of this study:
- Frequencies and percentages: to describe the demographic features for the study sample of respondents.
- Arithmetic average and standard deviation: to detect the response of the study sample on the variables.
- Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient and factor analysis to verify the reliability and validity of the research tool.
- Multi-colleniority test and normality test to verify the model fitting.• Simple regression method: to measure the impact of the relationship between each independent variable on the dependent variable.
- Multiple regression method: to measure the impact of the relationship between more than one independent variable and the dependent variable.
- Hierarchal regression analysis: to measure the impact of behavioral finance factors on stock investment decision-making attributed to demographic variables.
In order to achieve the desired objectives of this study, the researcher adopted and developed a questionnaire distributed to individual investors at ASE to measure the impact of behavioral finance on stock investment decision. The researcher used means standard deviations and relative importance to describe the respondents of question. The researcher gathered all variable items each variable separately.
Table 7 (Item No.11-15) indicates that the general average of loss aversion was (3.385) with standard deviation (0.612) and moderate relative importance. The item "When it comes to investment, no loss of capital (invested money) is more important than returns (profits)" was first with mean (4.040), and high relative importance, while item "I avoid selling shares that have decreased in value and readily sell shares that have increased in value". was last with mean (2.940) and moderate relative importance.
Table 7: Behavioral Finance Factors | ||||||
Item No . | Item | Mean | Standard Deviation | Relative Important | Rank | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | I am more concerned about a large loss in my stock than missing a substantial gain (profits). | 3.240 | 1.202 | Moderate | 3 | |
2 | I feel nervous when large price drops have in my invested stocks. | 3.100 | 1.151 | Moderate | 4 | |
3 | I will not increase my investment when the market performance is poor. | 3.607 | 0.955 | Moderate | 2 | |
4 | When it comes to investment, no loss of capital (invested money) is more important than returns (profits). | 4.040 | 0.940 | High | 1 | |
5 | I avoid selling shares that have decreased in value and readily sell shares that have increased in value. | 2.940 | 1.094 | Moderate | 5 | |
General average for loss aversion | 3.385 | 0.612 | Moderate | |||
6 | I think that I am an experienced investor. | 3.787 | 1.053 | High | 1 | |
7 | I feel more confident in my own investment opinions over opinions of my colleagues or friends | 3.313 | 0.837 | Moderate | 5 | |
8 | I don't consult others (family, friends or colleagues) before making stock investment decisions | 3.460 | 0.800 | Moderate | 2 | |
9 | I believe that my skills and knowledge of stock market can help me to outperform the market. | 3.340 | 1.009 | Moderate | 4 | |
10 | I am successful entrepreneur in an environment where many businesses fail | 3.347 | 0.777 | Moderate | 3 | |
General average for overconfidence | 3.449 | 0.471 | Moderate | |||
11 | Other investors' decisions of choosing stock types have impact on my investment decisions. | 3.120 | 0.843 | Moderate | 1 | |
12 | Other investors' decisions of the stock volume don't have impact on my investment decisions. | 3.000 | 0.955 | Moderate | 2 | |
13 | Other investors' decisions of buying and selling stocks have impact on my investment decisions. | 2.747 | 0.943 | Moderate | 4 | |
14 | I usually react quickly to the changes of other investors' decisions and follow their reactions to the stock market. | 2.940 | 0.936 | Moderate | 3 | |
General average for herding | 2.952 | 0.556 | Moderate | |||
Item No . | Item | Mean | Standard Deviation | Relative Important | Rank | |
11 | Other investors' decisions of choosing stock types have impact on my investment decisions. | 3.120 | 0.843 | Moderate | 1 | |
12 | Other investors' decisions of the stock volume don't have impact on my investment decisions. | 3.000 | 0.955 | Moderate | 2 | |
13 | Other investors' decisions of buying and selling stocks have impact on my investment decisions. | 2.747 | 0.943 | Moderate | 4 | |
14 | I usually react quickly to the changes of other investors' decisions and follow their reactions to the stock market. | 2.940 | 0.936 | Moderate | 3 | |
General average for herding | 2.952 | 0.556 | Moderate | |||
Item No . | Item | Mean | Standard Deviation | Relative Important | Rank | |
15 | I usually don't have a fear to invest in stocks that have a sure gain. | 2.920 | 0.959 | Moderate | 5 | |
16 | I am cautious about stocks which show sudden changes in price or trading activity. | 2.887 | 1.053 | Moderate | 6 | |
17 | I usually have worry investing in stocks that have had a past negative performance in trading | 3.720 | 0.984 | High | 1 | |
18 | I don't feel that the idea of participating in a buy/sell on the stock market is appealing | 3.567 | 1.019 | Moderate | 2 | |
19 | My investment in stocks is largely based on investment knowledge, experiences, and education. | 2.527 | 1.060 | Moderate | 3 | |
20 | I am hopeful when undertaking investment in stocks that have exhibited a sure loss. | 3.513 | 0.841 | Moderate | 4 | |
General average for risk perception | 3.189 | 0.534 | Moderate |
Table 7 (Item No.6-10) indicates that the general average of overconfidence was (3.449) with standard deviation (0.471) and moderate relative importance. The item "I think that I am an experienced investor" was first with mean (3.787), and high relative importance, while item "I feel more confident in my own investment opinions over opinions of my colleagues or friends" was last with mean (3.313) and moderate relative importance.
Table 7 (Item No.11-15) indicates that the general average of herding was (2.952) with standard deviation (0.556) and moderate relative importance. The item "Other investors' decisions of choosing stock types have impact on my investment decisions" was first with mean (3.120), and moderate relative importance, while item "Other investors' decisions of buying and selling stocks have impact on my investment decisions" was last with mean (2.747) and moderate relative importance. This means that the sample relies on their own personal opinions or the information necessary to take investment decisions with no denials being affected by investment decisions resulting of other investors.
Table 7 (Item 15-20) indicates that the general average of risk perception was (3.189) with a standard deviation (0.534) and moderate relative importance. The item "I usually have worry investing in stocks that have had a past negative performance in trading" was first with mean (3.720), and high relative importance, while item "I am cautious about stocks which show sudden changes in price or trading activity" was last with mean (2.887) and moderate relative importance. And this referring to the interest of the sample on the risks arising of investment in the financial market and at the same time is this realization impediment the investment operations.
Table 8 indicates that the general average of behavioral finance factors was (3.244) with standard deviation (0.307) and moderate relative importance. The factor "Overconfidence" was first with a mean of (3.449) with standard deviation (0.471), and moderate relative importance, while factor "Herding" was last with mean (2.952) with standard deviation (0.556) and moderate relative importance.
Table 8: Means, Standard Deviation And Relative Importance For Behavioral Variables | |||||
No . | Factor | Mean | Standard Deviation | Relative Important | Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Loss Aversion | 3.385 | 0.612 | Moderate | 2 |
2 | Overconfidence | 3.449 | 0.471 | Moderate | 1 |
3 | Herding | 2.952 | 0.556 | Moderate | 4 |
4 | Risk Perception | 3.189 | 0.534 | Moderate | 3 |
General average for behavioral finance factors | 3.244 | 0.307 | Moderate |
It also shows that the behavioral finance factors of investors' at ASE were generally moderate without the presence of a particular factor in the behavior of investors in general, and this may be due to the nature of ASE, which is characterized by weak efficiency and also indicates that many investors rely on brokerage firms consultations.
This study agrees with a study titled "Do Behavioral Finance Factors Influence Stock Investment Decisions of Individual Investors?" The main objective of this study was exploring the behavioral finance factors influencing the stock investment decision of individual investors at Saudi Stock Market (SSM) as one of the vital emerging markets in the Middle East. To conduct the study, a questionnaire has been built to measure the effect of behavioral finance factors on stock investment decision. (140) questionnaires have been distributed to the participants on randomly basis. Cronbach's Alpha was used to test the validity of the tool.