A discourse of melancholy also figures into the way Heidegger describes
his central notions of authenticity and inauthenticity. Heidegger
believes that we exist fundamentally with others and therefore that the
consciousness of the other is part and parcel of my own being and
consciousness. We are born into a complicated previously existing social
nexus with its own rules, assumptions and conceptual framework. Thus,
as a necessary and fundamental structure of the human condition, being
with others is neither good nor bad. Of course, positive relations such
as love and friendship can only arise out of social being. But Heidegger
also speaks disapprovingly of an anonymous "they" consisting of
"everyone and no-one":
"This being with one another
dissolves one's own Dasein completely into the kind of being of "the
Others", in such a way, indeed, that the Others, as distinguishable and
explicit, vanish more and more. In this inconspicuousness and
unascertainability, the real dictatorship of "the they" is unfolded. We
take pleasure and enjoy ourselves as they take pleasure; we read, see
and judge about literature and art as they see and judge… we find
"shocking" what they find shocking. The "they", which is nothing
definite, and which all are, though not as the sum, prescribes the kind
of being of everydayness…"
We
all at times somehow lose ourselves in the "public" mentality (fads,
gossip, "idle- talk"). By participating in this process, we are to
neutralize or cover over the anxiety naturally arising out of our
consciousness of other deeper, more disturbing structures of the human
condition, most specifically the radical finitude of each of our own
lives. Being lost in the banal attitudes of the public "they" allows us
to flee from what is (and what must essentially be) the solitary nature
of our confrontation with our own mortality.
Consider
the forms of inauthenticity discussed by Heidegger;he first discusses
"idle-talk" – the preoccupation with gossip and superficialities which
functions to divert our attention. It is also worth noting that his
characterization of "idle-talk", a means by which the "they-self"
operates in its fleeing from authentic understanding, is described
specifically in terms of the phenomenon of "groundlessness":
What
is said in the talk as such, spreads in wider circles and takes on an
authoritative character… Idle talk is constituted by… gossiping and
passing the word along – a process by which its initial lack of grounds
to stand on becomes aggravated to complete groundlessness…
Why
is it important to understand that Heidegger was preoccupied with
providing an analysis of the human condition which is "rooted" and
"grounded"? And why was he so often extolling the virtues of the
agrarian lifestyle? Because, as Rudiger Safranski writes: "the collapse
of yesterday's world in a world war … persuaded Heidegger that the
ground was shaking and that new beginning had to be made."
Echoing
Yeats' depiction above of how "things fall apart", the sense of
dislocation and unsettledness is also evident in many cultural products
of Germany's interwar years. Hence Brecht's Man Equals Man:
Hopes you'll feel the ground on which you stand
Slither between your toes like shifting sand
So that (the story) makes you aware
Life on this Earth is a hazardous affair.
The
artist Georg Grosz also notes, "I felt the ground shaking beneath my
feet, and the shaking was visible in my work." (see Willett 9). Consider
also the following interpretation of Ernst Bloch's 1932 essay "Berlin,
as Viewed from the Landscape", by David Durst:
Similar
to the uprooted and mobile modern individual, Berlin is a city rising
up out of an empty space, without apparent historical origins or firm
foundation: sitting "upon ground that is still undeveloped, unstable and
perpetually in need of improvement", it is literally a city built on
sand where the dust never settles. Like its restless dwellers, Berlin
"always becomes and never is", it is a city of unrest and perpetual
becoming with all its resident themes of instability and unmet
potential.
This
perceived backdrop of a shifting, unstable, and restless world provides
the context which now renders Heidegger's entire philosophical project
more intelligible – insofar as it involves an analysis of the human
condition as essentially grounded and bound to the earth. Modernist
artists like Brecht and Grosz may have been willing to embrace and/or
artistically depict Europe's spiritual dislocation, but Heidegger's
anti-modernism sought a return to a more solid, grounded reality. This
is why his analysis can be considered on some level as a discourse of
melancholy. In fact, Heidegger also wrote a number of pieces ("On the
Essence of Ground" and others) explicitly addressing the meaning of
"ground." In these works, the German term "grund" has often been
translated as "reason", but perhaps this issue is also implicitly and
more fundamentally about the search for "grounding" in a more
existential sense. Certainly, as a society begins to lose its grounding,
it requires a new set of values or guiding conceptual frameworks. But
what happens when these are not forthcoming in an immediate or obvious
sense? This cultural crisis formed the backdrop for Heidegger's entire
philosophical career and it is evident even in the "objective"
categories of his earliest and most important work Being andTime.
In
Being and Time, Heidegger also discusses "curiosity" – the continuous
search for the new and novel as a distractive technique. In Heidegger's
words, "When curiosity has become free, however, it concerns itself with
seeing, not in order to understand what is seen, but just in order to
see it. It seeks novelty only in order to leap from it anew to another
novelty. In this kind of seeing… lies… in the possibilities of
abandoning itself to the world." David Durst discusses precisely this
formof "distraction" through an analysis of Siegfried Kracauer's
writings on Weimar cinema. Kracauer explained the fascination with the
glamour and lights of the picture palaces where "distraction is raised
to the level of culture."
Phenomenologically,
distracted curiosity is drawn by the rapid fire pace of consecutive
images, a "fragmented sequence of sense impressions," in which: "the
stimulations of the senses succeed one another with such rapidity that
there is no room left between them for even the slightest contemplation…
The penchant for distraction demands and finds an answer in the display
of pure externality… " Heidegger would use the term "groundlessness" to
capture a similarexperience: "This movement of Dasein… we call its
"downward plunge." Dasein plunges out of itself into itself, into the
groundlessness and nullity of inauthentic existence." In place of this
restless search for diversion, Heidegger prescribes instead only the
difficult process of consciously confronting and accepting our own
finitude. "Authenticity" thus involves another, slightly different
melancholy than the mourning of lost innocence. This latter sense
involves the acceptance of one's own mortality, and the contingency of
all life. But confronting this condition makes us uncomfortable.
Heidegger acknowledges that the superficial gossip of the "they"
steadfastly refuses to allow each of us as individuals a silent space in
which to reflect. It refuses to allow us the "courage for anxiety" in
the face of death. This different melancholy is thus a threat to the
"they", and when it asserts itself, inauthentic forms of public
discourse make sure to "change the subject" and suppress it as quickly
as possible.