The Great War to the Roaring Twenties
Site: | Saylor Academy |
Course: | HIST363: Global Perspectives on Industrialization |
Book: | The Great War to the Roaring Twenties |
Printed by: | Guest user |
Date: | Wednesday, May 14, 2025, 2:04 PM |
Description
Read this text about the period from wartime into the age of prosperity and decadence that followed in the 1920s. It also covers some different takes on social attitudes of the time. Feel free to read selectively for those.
Americans and the Great War, 1914–1919
Introduction
On the eve
of World War I, the U.S. government under President Woodrow Wilson
opposed any entanglement in international military conflicts. But as the
war engulfed Europe and the belligerents' total war strategies targeted
commerce and travel across the Atlantic, it became clear that the
United States would not be able to maintain its position of neutrality.
Still, the American public was of mixed opinion; many resisted the idea
of American intervention and American lives lost, no matter how bad the
circumstances.
Source: OpenStax College, https://courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-fscj-ushistory2/chapter/the-great-war-to-the-roaring-twenties/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
American Isolationism and the European Origins of War
Unlike his immediate predecessors, President Woodrow Wilson had planned to shrink the role of the United States in foreign affairs. He believed that the nation needed to intervene in international events only when there was a moral imperative to do so. But as Europe's political situation grew dire, it became increasingly difficult for Wilson to insist that the conflict growing overseas was not America's responsibility. Germany's war tactics struck most observers as morally reprehensible, while also putting American free trade with the Entente at risk. Despite campaign promises and diplomatic efforts, Wilson could only postpone American involvement in the war.
Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom
When
Woodrow Wilson took over the White House in March 1913, he promised a
less expansionist approach to American foreign policy than Theodore
Roosevelt and William Howard Taft had pursued. Wilson did share the
commonly held view that American values were superior to those of the
rest of the world, that democracy was the best system to promote peace
and stability, and that the United States should continue to actively
pursue economic markets abroad. But he proposed an idealistic foreign
policy based on morality, rather than American self-interest, and felt
that American interference in another nation's affairs should occur only
when the circumstances rose to the level of a moral imperative.
Wilson
appointed former presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan, a noted
anti-imperialist and proponent of world peace, as his Secretary of
State. Bryan undertook his new assignment with great vigor, encouraging
nations around the world to sign "cooling off treaties," under which
they agreed to resolve international disputes through talks, not war,
and to submit any grievances to an international commission. Bryan also
negotiated friendly relations with Colombia, including a $25 million
apology for Roosevelt's actions during the Panamanian Revolution, and
worked to establish effective self-government in the Philippines in
preparation for the eventual American withdrawal. Even with Bryan's
support, however, Wilson found that it was much harder than he
anticipated to keep the United States out of world affairs. In reality,
the United States was interventionist in areas where its interests -
direct or indirect - were threatened.
Wilson's greatest break
from his predecessors occurred in Asia, where he abandoned Taft's
"dollar diplomacy," a foreign policy that essentially used the power of
U.S. economic dominance as a threat to gain favorable terms. Instead,
Wilson revived diplomatic efforts to keep Japanese interference there at
a minimum. But as World War I, also known as the Great War, began to
unfold, and European nations largely abandoned their imperialistic
interests in order to marshal their forces for self-defense, Japan
demanded that China succumb to a Japanese protectorate over their entire
nation. In 1917, William Jennings Bryan's successor as Secretary of
State, Robert Lansing, signed the Lansing-Ishii Agreement, which
recognized Japanese control over the Manchurian region of China in
exchange for Japan's promise not to exploit the war to gain a greater
foothold in the rest of the country.
Furthering his goal of
reducing overseas interventions, Wilson had promised not to rely on the
Roosevelt Corollary, Theodore Roosevelt's explicit policy that the
United States could involve itself in Latin American politics whenever
it felt that the countries in the Western Hemisphere needed policing.
Once president, however, Wilson again found that it was more difficult
to avoid American interventionism in practice than in rhetoric. Indeed,
Wilson intervened more in Western Hemisphere affairs than either Taft or
Roosevelt.
In 1915, when a revolution in Haiti resulted in the
murder of the Haitian president and threatened the safety of New York
banking interests in the country, Wilson sent over three hundred U.S.
Marines to establish order.
Subsequently, the United States
assumed control over the island's foreign policy as well as its
financial administration. One year later, in 1916, Wilson again sent
marines to Hispaniola, this time to the Dominican Republic, to ensure
prompt payment of a debt that nation owed. In 1917, Wilson sent troops
to Cuba to protect American-owned sugar plantations from attacks by
Cuban rebels; this time, the troops remained for four years.
Wilson's
most noted foreign policy foray prior to World War I focused on Mexico,
where rebel general Victoriano Huerta had seized control from a
previous rebel government just weeks before Wilson's inauguration.
Wilson refused to recognize Huerta's government, instead choosing to
make an example of Mexico by demanding that they hold democratic
elections and establish laws based on the moral principles he espoused.
Officially, Wilson supported Venustiano Carranza, who opposed Huerta's
military control of the country. When American intelligence learned of a
German ship allegedly preparing to deliver weapons to Huerta's forces,
Wilson ordered the U.S. Navy to land forces at Veracruz to stop the
shipment.
On April 22, 1914, a fight erupted between the U.S.
Navy and Mexican troops, resulting in nearly 150 deaths, nineteen of
them American. Although Carranza's faction managed to overthrow Huerta
in the summer of 1914, most Mexicans - including Carranza - had come to
resent American intervention in their affairs. Carranza refused to work
with Wilson and the U.S. government, and instead threatened to defend
Mexico's mineral rights against all American oil companies established
there. Wilson then turned to support rebel forces who opposed Carranza,
most notably Pancho Villa. However, Villa lacked the strength in number
or weapons to overtake Carranza; in 1915, Wilson reluctantly authorized
official U.S. recognition of Carranza's government.
As a
postscript, an irate Pancho Villa turned against Wilson, and on March 9,
1916, led a fifteen-hundred-man force across the border into New
Mexico, where they attacked and burned the town of Columbus. Over one
hundred people died in the attack, seventeen of them American. Wilson
responded by sending General John Pershing into Mexico to capture Villa
and return him to the United States for trial. With over eleven thousand
troops at his disposal, Pershing marched three hundred miles into
Mexico before an angry Carranza ordered U.S. troops to withdraw from the
nation. Although reelected in 1916, Wilson reluctantly ordered the
withdrawal of U.S. troops from Mexico in 1917, avoiding war with Mexico
and enabling preparations for American intervention in Europe. Again, as
in China, Wilson's attempt to impose a moral foreign policy had failed
in light of economic and political realities.
War Erupts in Europe
When
a Serbian nationalist murdered the Archduke Franz Ferdinand of the
Austro-Hungarian Empire on June 29, 1914, the underlying forces that led
to World War I had already long been in motion and seemed, at first, to
have little to do with the United States. At the time, the events that
pushed Europe from ongoing tensions into war seemed very far away from
U.S. interests. For nearly a century, nations had negotiated a series of
mutual defense alliance treaties to secure themselves against their
imperialistic rivals. Among the largest European powers, the Triple
Entente included an alliance of France, Great Britain, and Russia.
Opposite them, the Central powers, also known as the Triple Alliance,
included Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, and initially
Italy. A series of "side treaties" likewise entangled the larger
European powers to protect several smaller ones should war break out.
At
the same time that European nations committed each other to defense
pacts, they jockeyed for power over empires overseas and invested
heavily in large, modern militaries. Dreams of empire and military
supremacy fueled an era of nationalism that was particularly pronounced
in the newer nations of Germany and Italy, but also provoked separatist
movements among Europeans. The Irish rose up in rebellion against
British rule, for example. And in Bosnia's capital of Sarajevo, Gavrilo
Princip and his accomplices assassinated the Austro-Hungarian archduke
in their fight for a pan-Slavic nation. Thus, when Serbia failed to
accede to Austro-Hungarian demands in the wake of the archduke's murder,
Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia with the confidence that it had
the backing of Germany. This action, in turn, brought Russia into the
conflict, due to a treaty in which they had agreed to defend Serbia.
Germany followed suit by declaring war on Russia, fearing that Russia
and France would seize this opportunity to move on Germany if it did not
take the offensive. The eventual German invasion of Belgium drew Great
Britain into the war, followed by the attack of the Ottoman Empire on
Russia. By the end of August 1914, it seemed as if Europe had dragged
the entire world into war.
The Great War was unlike any war that
came before it. Whereas in previous European conflicts, troops typically
faced each other on open battlefields, World War I saw new military
technologies that turned war into a conflict of prolonged trench
warfare. Both sides used new artillery, tanks, airplanes, machine guns,
barbed wire, and, eventually, poison gas: weapons that strengthened
defenses and turned each military offense into barbarous sacrifices of
thousands of lives with minimal territorial advances in return. By the
end of the war, the total military death toll was ten million, as well
as another million civilian deaths attributed to military action, and
another six million civilian deaths caused by famine, disease, or other
related factors.
aOne terrifying new piece of technological
warfare was the German unterseeboot - an "undersea boat" or U-boat. By
early 1915, in an effort to break the British naval blockade of Germany
and turn the tide of the war, the Germans dispatched a fleet of these
submarines around Great Britain to attack both merchant and military
ships. The U-boats acted in direct violation of international law,
attacking without warning from beneath the water instead of surfacing
and permitting the surrender of civilians or crew. By 1918, German
U-boats had sunk nearly five thousand vessels.
Of greatest
historical note was the attack on the British passenger ship, RMS
Lusitania, on its way from New York to Liverpool on May 7, 1915. The
German Embassy in the United States had announced that this ship would
be subject to attack for its cargo of ammunition: an allegation that
later proved accurate. Nonetheless, almost 1,200 civilians died in the
attack, including 128 Americans. The attack horrified the world,
galvanizing support in England and beyond for the war. This attack, more
than any other event, would test President Wilson's desire to stay out
of what had been a largely European conflict.
Figure 6-1: Lusitania sunk 8 May 1915 by Unknown is in the Public Domain . Newspaper headlines from the day after the sinking of the Lusitania reveal the shock and confusion felt at the time.
The Challenge of Neutrality
Despite the loss of American lives on the Lusitania, President Wilson stuck to his path of neutrality in Europe's escalating war: in part out of moral principle, in part as a matter of practical necessity, and in part for political reasons. Few Americans wished to participate in the devastating battles that ravaged Europe, and Wilson did not want to risk losing his reelection by ordering an unpopular military intervention. Wilson's "neutrality" did not mean isolation from all warring factions, but rather open markets for the United States and continued commercial ties with all belligerents.
For Wilson, the conflict did not reach the
threshold of a moral imperative for U.S. involvement; it was largely a
European affair involving numerous countries with whom the United States
wished to maintain working relations. In his message to Congress in
1914, the president noted that "Every man who really loves America will
act and speak in the true spirit of neutrality, which is the spirit of
impartiality and fairness and friendliness to all concerned".
Wilson
understood that he was already looking at a difficult reelection bid.
He had only won the 1912 election with 42 percent of the popular vote,
and likely would not have been elected at all had Roosevelt not come
back as a third-party candidate to run against his former protégée Taft.
Wilson felt pressure from all different political constituents to take a
position on the war, yet he knew that elections were seldom won with a
campaign promise of "If elected, I will send your sons to war!"
Facing
pressure from some businessmen and other government officials who felt
that the protection of America's best interests required a stronger
position in defense of the Allied forces, Wilson agreed to a
"preparedness campaign" in the year prior to the election. This campaign
included the passage of the National Defense Act of 1916, which more
than doubled the size of the army to nearly 225,000, and the Naval
Appropriations Act of 1916, which called for the expansion of the U.S.
fleet, including battleships, destroyers, submarines, and other ships.
As
the 1916 election approached, the Republican Party hoped to capitalize
on the fact that Wilson was making promises that he would not be able to
keep. They nominated Charles Evans Hughes, a former governor of New
York and sitting U.S. Supreme Court justice at the time of his
nomination. Hughes focused his campaign on what he considered Wilson's
foreign policy failures, but even as he did so, he himself tried to walk
a fine line between neutrality and belligerence, depending on his
audience.
In contrast, Wilson and the Democrats capitalized on
neutrality and campaigned under the slogan "Wilson - he kept us out of
war". The election itself remained too close to call on election night.
Only when a tight race in California was decided two days later could
Wilson claim victory in his reelection bid, again with less than 50
percent of the popular vote. Despite his victory based upon a policy of
neutrality, Wilson would find true neutrality a difficult challenge.
Several different factors pushed Wilson, however reluctantly, toward the
inevitability of American involvement.
A key factor driving U.S.
engagement was economics. Great Britain was the country's most
important trading partner, and the Allies as a whole relied heavily on
American imports from the earliest days of the war forward.
Specifically, the value of all exports to the Allies quadrupled from
$750 million to $3 billion in the first two years of the war. At the
same time, the British naval blockade meant that exports to Germany all
but ended, dropping from $350 million to $30 million. Likewise, numerous
private banks in the United States made extensive loans – in excess of
$500 million – to England. J. P. Morgan's banking interests were among
the largest lenders, due to his family's connection to the country.
Another
key factor in the decision to go to war were the deep ethnic divisions
between native-born Americans and more recent immigrants. For those of
Anglo-Saxon descent, the nation's historic and ongoing relationship with
Great Britain was paramount, but many Irish-Americans resented British
rule over their place of birth and opposed support for the world's most
expansive empire. Millions of Jewish immigrants had fled anti-Semitic
pogroms in Tsarist Russia and would have supported any nation fighting
that authoritarian state. German Americans saw their nation of origin as
a victim of British and Russian aggression and a French desire to
settle old scores, whereas emigrants from Austria-Hungary and the
Ottoman Empire were mixed in their sympathies for the old monarchies or
ethnic communities that these empires suppressed. For interventionists,
this lack of support for Great Britain and its allies among recent
immigrants only strengthened their conviction.
Germany's use of
submarine warfare also played a role in challenging U.S. neutrality.
After the sinking of the Lusitania, and the subsequent August 30 sinking
of another British liner, the Arabic, Germany had promised to restrict
their use of submarine warfare. Specifically, they promised to surface
and visually identify any ship before they fired, as well as permit
civilians to evacuate targeted ships. Instead, in February 1917, Germany
intensified their use of submarines in an effort to end the war quickly
before Great Britain's naval blockade starved them out of food and
supplies.
The German high command wanted to continue unrestricted
warfare on all Atlantic traffic, including unarmed American freighters,
in order to cripple the British economy and secure a quick and decisive
victory. Their goal: to bring an end to the war before the United
States could intervene and tip the balance in this grueling war of
attrition. In February 1917, a German U-boat sank the American merchant
ship, the Laconia, killing two passengers, and, in late March, quickly
sunk four more American ships. These attacks increased pressure on
Wilson from all sides, as government officials, the general public, and
both Democrats and Republicans urged him to declare war.
The
final element that led to American involvement in World War I was the
so-called Zimmermann telegram. British intelligence intercepted and
decoded a top-secret telegram from German foreign minister Arthur
Zimmermann to the German ambassador to Mexico, instructing the latter to
invite Mexico to join the war effort on the German side, should the
United States declare war on Germany. It further went on to encourage
Mexico to invade the United States if such a declaration came to pass,
as Mexico's invasion would create a diversion and permit Germany a clear
path to victory. In exchange, Zimmermann offered to return to Mexico
land that was previously lost to the United States in the
Mexican-American War, including Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas.
The
likelihood that Mexico, weakened and torn by its own revolution and
civil war, could wage war against the United States and recover
territory lost in the Mexican-American war with Germany's help was
remote at best. But combined with Germany's unrestricted use of
submarine warfare and the sinking of American ships, the Zimmermann
telegram made a powerful argument for a declaration of war. The outbreak
of the Russian Revolution in February and abdication of Tsar Nicholas
II in March raised the prospect of democracy in the Eurasian empire and
removed an important moral objection to entering the war on the side of
the Allies.
On April 2, 1917, Wilson asked Congress to declare war on
Germany. Congress debated for four days, and several senators and
congressmen expressed their concerns that the war was being fought over
U.S. economic interests more than strategic need or democratic ideals.
When Congress voted on April 6, fifty-six voted against the resolution,
including the first woman ever elected to Congress, Representative
Jeannette Rankin. This was the largest "no" vote against a war
resolution in American history.

Figure 6-2 : Zimmerman-telegramm-offen by National Archives is in the Public Domain .This telegram was sent by German Foreign Minister Arthur Zimmermann to the President of Mexico proposing a military alliance against the United States. In return for Mexican support in the war, Germany would help Mexico regain New Mexico, Texas, and Arizona from the United States. The British intercepted the secret message, deciphered it, and turned it over to the U.S. Government.
The United States Prepares for War
Wilson knew that the key to America's success in war lay largely in its preparation. With both the Allied and enemy forces entrenched in battles of attrition, and supplies running low on both sides, the United States needed, first and foremost, to secure enough men, money, food, and supplies to be successful. The country needed to first supply the basic requirements to fight a war, and then work to ensure military leadership, public support, and strategic planning.
The Ingredients of War
The
First World War was, in many ways, a war of attrition, and the United
States needed a large army to help the Allies. In 1917, when the United
States declared war on Germany, the U.S. Army ranked seventh in the
world in terms of size, with an estimated 200,000 enlisted men. In
contrast, at the outset of the war in 1914, the German force included
4.5 million men, and the country ultimately mobilized over eleven
million soldiers over the course of the entire war.
To compose a
fighting force, Congress passed the Selective Service Act in 1917, which
initially required all men aged twenty-one through thirty to register
for the draft. In 1918, the act was expanded to include all men between
eighteen and forty-five. Through a campaign of patriotic appeals, as
well as an administrative system that allowed men to register at their
local draft boards rather than directly with the federal government,
over ten million men registered for the draft on the very first day. By
the war's end, twenty-two million men had registered for the U.S. Army
draft. Five million of these men were actually drafted, another 1.5
million volunteered, and over 500,000 additional men signed up for the
navy or marines. In all, two million men participated in combat
operations overseas. Among the volunteers were also twenty thousand
women, a quarter of whom went to France to serve as nurses or in
clerical positions.
But the draft also provoked opposition, and
almost 350,000 eligible Americans refused to register for military
service. About 65,000 of these defied the conscription law as
conscientious objectors, mostly on the grounds of their deeply held
religious beliefs. Such opposition was not without risks, and whereas
most objectors were never prosecuted, those who were found guilty at
military hearings received stiff punishments: Courts handed down over
two hundred prison sentences of twenty years or more, and seventeen
death sentences.
With the size of the army growing, the U.S.
government next needed to ensure that there were adequate supplies - in
particular food and fuel - for both the soldiers and the home front.
Concerns over shortages led to the passage of the Lever Food and Fuel
Control Act, which empowered the president to control the production,
distribution, and price of all food products during the war effort.
Using this law, Wilson created both a Fuel Administration and a Food
Administration. The Fuel Administration, run by Harry Garfield, created
the concept of "fuel holidays," encouraging civilian Americans to do
their part for the war effort by rationing fuel on certain days.
Garfield also implemented "daylight saving time" for the first time in
American history, shifting the clocks to allow more productive daylight
hours. Herbert Hoover coordinated the Food Administration, and he too
encouraged volunteer rationing by invoking patriotism. With the slogan
"food will win the war," Hoover encouraged "Meatless Mondays,"
"Wheatless Wednesdays," and other similar reductions, with the hope of
rationing food for military use.
Wilson also created the War
Industries Board, run by Bernard Baruch, to ensure adequate military
supplies. The War Industries Board had the power to direct shipments of
raw materials, as well as to control government contracts with private
producers. Baruch used lucrative contracts with guaranteed profits to
encourage several private firms to shift their production over to
wartime materials. For those firms that refused to cooperate, Baruch's
government control over raw materials provided him with the necessary
leverage to convince them to join the war effort, willingly or not.
As
a way to move all the personnel and supplies around the country
efficiently, Congress created the U.S. Railroad Administration.
Logistical problems had led trains bound for the East Coast to get
stranded as far away as Chicago. To prevent these problems, Wilson
appointed William McAdoo, the Secretary of the Treasury, to lead this
agency, which had extraordinary war powers to control the entire
railroad industry, including traffic, terminals, rates, and wages.
Almost
all the practical steps were in place for the United States to fight a
successful war. The only step remaining was to figure out how to pay for
it. The war effort was costly - with an eventual price tag in excess of
$32 billion by 1920 - and the government needed to finance it.
The
Liberty Loan Act allowed the federal government to sell liberty bonds
to the American public, extolling citizens to "do their part" to help
the war effort and bring the troops home. The government ultimately
raised $23 billion through liberty bonds. Additional monies came from
the government's use of federal income tax revenue, which was made
possible by the passage of the Sixteenth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution in 1913. With the financing, transportation, equipment,
food, and men in place, the United States was ready to enter the war.
The next piece the country needed was public support.
Controlling Dissent
Although
all the physical pieces required to fight a war fell quickly into
place, the question of national unity was another concern. The American
public was strongly divided on the subject of entering the war. While
many felt it was the only choice, others protested strongly, feeling it
was not America's war to fight. Wilson needed to ensure that a nation of
diverse immigrants, with ties to both sides of the conflict, thought of
themselves as American first, and their home country's nationality
second. To do this, he initiated a propaganda campaign, pushing the
"America First" message, which sought to convince Americans that they
should do everything in their power to ensure an American victory, even
if that meant silencing their own criticisms.
American First, American Above All
At
the outset of the war, one of the greatest challenges for Wilson was
the lack of national unity. The country, after all, was made up of
immigrants, some recently arrived and some well-established, but all
with ties to their home countries. These home countries included Germany
and Russia, as well as Great Britain and France. In an effort to ensure
that Americans eventually supported the war, the government pro-war
propaganda campaign focused on driving home that message.
Regardless
of how patriotic immigrants might feel and act, however, an anti-German
xenophobia overtook the country. German Americans were persecuted, and
their businesses shunned, whether or not they voiced any objection to
the war. Some cities changed the names of the streets and buildings if
they were German. Libraries withdrew German-language books from the
shelves, and German Americans began to avoid speaking German for fear of
reprisal. For some immigrants, the war was fought on two fronts: on the
battlefields of France and again at home.
The Wilson
administration created the Committee of Public Information under
director George Creel, a former journalist, just days after the United
States declared war on Germany. Creel employed artists, speakers,
writers, and filmmakers to develop a propaganda machine. The goal was to
encourage all Americans to make sacrifices during the war and, equally
importantly, to hate all things German. Through efforts such as the
establishment of "loyalty leagues" in ethnic immigrant communities,
Creel largely succeeded in molding an anti-German sentiment around the
country. The result? Some schools banned the teaching of the German
language and some restaurants refused to serve frankfurters, sauerkraut,
or hamburgers, instead serving "liberty dogs with liberty cabbage" and
"liberty sandwiches". Symphonies refused to perform music written by
German composers. The hatred of Germans grew so widespread that, at one
point, at a circus, audience members cheered when, in an act gone
horribly wrong, a Russian bear mauled a German animal trainer (whose
ethnicity was more a part of the act than reality).
In addition
to its propaganda campaign, the U.S. government also tried to secure
broad support for the war effort with repressive legislation. The
Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 prohibited individual trade with an
enemy nation and banned the use of the postal service for disseminating
any literature deemed treasonous by the postmaster general. That same
year, the Espionage Act prohibited giving aid to the enemy by spying, or
espionage, as well as any public comments that opposed the American war
effort. Under this act, the government could impose fines and
imprisonment of up to twenty years. The Sedition Act, passed in 1918,
prohibited any criticism or disloyal language against the federal
government and its policies, the U.S. Constitution, the military
uniform, or the American flag. More than two thousand persons were
charged with violating these laws, and many received prison sentences of
up to twenty years. Immigrants faced deportation as punishment for
their dissent. Not since the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 had the
federal government so infringed on the freedom of speech of loyal
American citizens.
In the months and years after these laws came
into being, over one thousand people were convicted for their violation,
primarily under the Espionage and Sedition Acts. More importantly, many
more war critics were frightened into silence. One notable prosecution
was that of Socialist Party leader Eugene Debs, who received a ten-year
prison sentence for encouraging draft resistance, which, under the
Espionage Act, was considered "giving aid to the enemy". Prominent
Socialist Victor Berger was also prosecuted under the Espionage Act and
subsequently twice denied his seat in Congress, to which he had been
properly elected by the citizens of Milwaukee, Wisconsin. One of the
more outrageous prosecutions was that of a film producer who released a
film about the American Revolution: Prosecutors found the film
seditious, and a court convicted the producer to ten years in prison for
portraying the British, who were now American allies, as the obedient
soldiers of a monarchical empire.
State and local officials, as
well as private citizens, aided the government's efforts to investigate,
identify, and crush subversion. Over 180,000 communities created local
"councils of defense," which encouraged members to report any antiwar
comments to local authorities. This mandate encouraged spying on
neighbors, teachers, local newspapers, and other individuals. In
addition, a larger national organization - the American Protective
League - received support from the Department of Justice to spy on
prominent dissenters, as well as open their mail and physically assault
draft evaders.
Understandably, opposition to such repression
began mounting. In 1917, Roger Baldwin formed the National Civil
Liberties Bureau - a forerunner to the American Civil Liberties Union,
which was founded in 1920 - to challenge the government's policies
against wartime dissent and conscientious objection. In 1919, the case
of Schenck v. United States went to the U.S. Supreme Court to challenge
the constitutionality of the Espionage and Sedition Acts. The case
concerned Charles Schenck, a leader in the Socialist Party of
Philadelphia, who had distributed fifteen thousand leaflets, encouraging
young men to avoid conscription. The court ruled that during a time of
war, the federal government was justified in passing such laws to quiet
dissenters. The decision was unanimous, and in the court's opinion,
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote that such dissent presented a "clear
and present danger" to the safety of the United States and the
military, and was therefore justified. He further explained how the
First Amendment right of free speech did not protect such dissent, in
the same manner that a citizen could not be freely permitted to yell
"fire!" in a crowded theater, due to the danger it presented. Congress
ultimately repealed most of the Espionage and Sedition Acts in 1921, and
several who were imprisoned for violation of those acts were then
quickly released. But the Supreme Court's deference to the federal
government's restrictions on civil liberties remained a volatile topic
in future wars.
A New Home Front
The lives of all Americans, whether they
went abroad to fight or stayed on the home front, changed dramatically
during the war. Restrictive laws censored dissent at home, and the armed
forces demanded unconditional loyalty from millions of volunteers and
conscripted soldiers. For organized labor, women, and African Americans
in particular, the war brought changes to the prewar status quo. Some
white women worked outside of the home for the first time, whereas
others, like African American men, found that they were eligible for
jobs that had previously been reserved for white men. African American
women, too, were able to seek employment beyond the domestic servant
jobs that had been their primary opportunity. These new options and
freedoms were not easily erased after the war ended.
New Opportunities Born from War
After
decades of limited involvement in the challenges between management and
organized labor, the need for peaceful and productive industrial
relations prompted the federal government during wartime to invite
organized labor to the negotiating table. Samuel Gompers, head of the
American Federation of Labor (AFL), sought to capitalize on these
circumstances to better organize workers and secure for them better
wages and working conditions. His efforts also solidified his own base
of power. The increase in production that the war required exposed
severe labor shortages in many states, a condition that was further
exacerbated by the draft, which pulled millions of young men from the
active labor force.
Wilson only briefly investigated the
longstanding animosity between labor and management before ordering the
creation of the National Labor War Board in April 1918. Quick
negotiations with Gompers and the AFL resulted in a promise: Organized
labor would make a "no-strike pledge" for the duration of the war, in
exchange for the U.S. government's protection of workers' rights to
organize and bargain collectively. The federal government kept its
promise and promoted the adoption of an eight-hour workday (which had
first been adopted by government employees in 1868), a living wage for
all workers, and union membership. As a result, union membership
skyrocketed during the war, from 2.6 million members in 1916 to 4.1
million in 1919. In short, American workers received better working
conditions and wages, as a result of the country's participation in the
war. However, their economic gains were limited.
While prosperity
overall went up during the war, it was enjoyed more by business owners
and corporations than by the workers themselves. Even though wages
increased, inflation offset most of the gains. Prices in the United
States increased an average of 15–20 percent annually between 1917 and
1920. Individual purchasing power actually declined during the war due
to the substantially higher cost of living. Business profits, in
contrast, increased by nearly a third during the war.
Women in Wartime
For
women, the economic situation was complicated by the war, with the
departure of wage-earning men and the higher cost of living pushing many
toward less comfortable lives. At the same time, however, wartime
presented new opportunities for women in the workplace. More than one
million women entered the workforce for the first time as a result of
the war, while more than eight million working women found higher paying
jobs, often in industry. Many women also found employment in what were
typically considered male occupations, such as on the railroads, where
the number of women tripled, and on assembly lines. After the war ended
and men returned home and searched for work, women were fired from their
jobs, and expected to return home and care for their families.
Furthermore, even when they were doing men's jobs, women were typically
paid lower wages than male workers, and unions were ambivalent at best -
and hostile at worst - to women workers. Even under these
circumstances, wartime employment familiarized women with an alternative
to a life in domesticity and dependency, making a life of employment,
even a career, plausible for women. When, a generation later, World War
II arrived, this trend would increase dramatically.
One notable
group of women who exploited these new opportunities was the Women's
Land Army of America. First during World War I, then again in World War
II, these women stepped up to run farms and other agricultural
enterprises, as men left for the armed forces. Known as Farmerettes,
some twenty thousand women - mostly college educated and from larger
urban areas - served in this capacity. Their reasons for joining were
manifold. For some, it was a way to serve their country during a time of
war. Others hoped to capitalize on the efforts to further the fight for
women's suffrage.
Also of special note were the approximately
thirty thousand American women who served in the military, as well as a
variety of humanitarian organizations, such as the Red Cross and YMCA,
during the war. In addition to serving as military nurses (without
rank), American women also served as telephone operators in France. Of
this latter group, 230 of them, known as "Hello Girls," were bilingual
and stationed in combat areas. Over eighteen thousand American women
served as Red Cross nurses, providing much of the medical support
available to American troops in France. Close to three hundred nurses
died during service. Many of those who returned home continued to work
in hospitals and home healthcare, helping wounded veterans heal both
emotionally and physically from the scars of war.
African Americans in the Crusade for Democracy

Figure 6-3: Some of the (African American) men of the 369 th (15 th New York) by International Film Service Photographer is in the Public Domain .These men are noted for winning the Croix de Guerre (French military decoration – "Cross of War") for gallantry in action. Left to right. Front row: Pvt. Ed. Williams, Herbert Taylor, Pvt. Leon Fraitor, Pvt. Ralph Hawkins. Back row. Sgt. H. D. Prinas, Sgt. Dan Storms, Pvt. Joe Williams,. Pvt. Alfred Hanley, and Cpl. T.W. Taylor
African Americans also found that the war brought upheaval and opportunity. Blacks composed 13 percent of the enlisted military, with 350,000 men serving. Colonel Charles Young of the Tenth Cavalry division served as the highest-ranking African American officer. Blacks served in segregated units and suffered from widespread racism in the military hierarchy, often serving in menial or support roles. Some troops saw combat, however, and were commended for serving with valor. The 369th Infantry, for example, known as the Harlem Hellfighters, served on the frontline of France for six months, longer than any other American unit. One hundred seventy-one men from that regiment received the Legion of Merit for meritorious service in combat. The regiment marched in a homecoming parade in New York City, was remembered in paintings, and was celebrated for bravery and leadership. The accolades given to them, however, in no way extended to the bulk of African Americans fighting in the war.
On the home front, African Americans, like American women, saw economic opportunities increase during the war. During the so-called Great Migration (discussed in a previous chapter), nearly 350,000 African Americans had fled the post-Civil War South for opportunities in northern urban areas. From 1910–1920, they moved north and found work in the steel, mining, shipbuilding, and automotive industries, among others. African American women also sought better employment opportunities beyond their traditional roles as domestic servants. By 1920, over 100,000 women had found work in diverse manufacturing industries, up from 70,000 in 1910. Despite such opportunities, racism continued to be a major force in both the North and South. Worried about the large influx of black Americans into their cities, several municipalities passed residential codes designed to prohibit African Americans from settling in certain neighborhoods.
Race riots also increased in frequency: In 1917 alone, there were race riots in twenty-five cities, including East Saint Louis, where thirty-nine blacks were killed. In the South, white business and plantation owners feared that their cheap workforce was fleeing the region, and used violence to intimidate blacks into staying. According to NAACP statistics, recorded incidences of lynching increased from thirty-eight in 1917 to eighty-three in 1919. These numbers did not start to decrease until 1923, when the number of annual lynchings dropped below thirty-five for the first time since the Civil War.
The Last Vestiges of Progressivism
Across
the United States, the war intersected with the last lingering efforts
of the Progressives who sought to use the war as motivation for their
final push for change. It was in large part due to the war's influence
that Progressives were able to lobby for the passage of the Eighteenth
and Nineteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The Eighteenth
Amendment, prohibiting alcohol, and the Nineteenth Amendment, giving
women the right to vote, received their final impetus due to the war
effort.
Prohibition, as the anti-alcohol movement became known,
had been a goal of many Progressives for decades. Organizations such as
the Women's Christian Temperance Union and the Anti-Saloon League linked
alcohol consumption with any number of societal problems, and they had
worked tirelessly with municipalities and counties to limit or prohibit
alcohol on a local scale. But with the war, prohibitionists saw an
opportunity for federal action. One factor that helped their cause was
the strong anti-German sentiment that gripped the country, which turned
sympathy away from the largely German-descended immigrants who ran the
breweries.
Furthermore, the public cry to ration food and grain -
the latter being a key ingredient in both beer and hard alcohol - made
prohibition even more patriotic. Congress ratified the Eighteenth
Amendment in January 1919, with provisions to take effect one year
later. Specifically, the amendment prohibited the manufacture, sale, and
transportation of intoxicating liquors. It did not prohibit the
drinking of alcohol, as there was a widespread feeling that such
language would be viewed as too intrusive on personal rights. However,
by eliminating the manufacture, sale, and transport of such beverages,
drinking was effectively outlawed. Shortly thereafter, Congress passed
the Volstead Act, translating the Eighteenth Amendment into an
enforceable ban on the consumption of alcoholic beverages, and
regulating the scientific and industrial uses of alcohol. The act also
specifically excluded from prohibition the use of alcohol for religious
rituals.
Unfortunately for proponents of the amendment, the ban
on alcohol did not take effect until one full year following the end of
the war. Almost immediately following the war, the general public began
to oppose - and clearly violate - the law, making it very difficult to
enforce. Doctors and druggists, who could prescribe whisky for medicinal
purposes, found themselves inundated with requests. In the 1920s,
organized crime and gangsters like Al Capone would capitalize on the
persistent demand for liquor, making fortunes in the illegal trade. A
lack of enforcement, compounded by an overwhelming desire by the public
to obtain alcohol at all costs, eventually resulted in the repeal of the
law in 1933.
The First World War also provided the impetus for
another longstanding goal of some reformers: universal suffrage.
Supporters of equal rights for women pointed to Wilson's rallying cry of
a war "to make the world safe for democracy," as hypocritical, saying
he was sending American boys to die for such principles while
simultaneously denying American women their democratic right to vote.
Carrie Chapman Catt, president of the National American Women Suffrage
Movement, capitalized on the growing patriotic fervor to point out that
every woman who gained the vote could exercise that right in a show of
loyalty to the nation, thus offsetting the dangers of draft-dodgers or
naturalized Germans who already had the right to vote.

Figure 6-4: Suffragette banner carried in picket of the White House by Harris & Ewing is in the Public Domain. One of the many placards in support of women's suffrage used to picket the Wilson White House during World War I.
Alice Paul, of the National Women's Party, organized more radical tactics, bringing national attention to the issue of women's suffrage by organizing protests outside the White House and, later, hunger strikes among arrested protesters. By the end of the war, the abusive treatment of suffragist hunger-strikers in prison, women's important contribution to the war effort, and the arguments of his suffragist daughter Jessie Woodrow Wilson Sayre moved President Wilson to understand women's right to vote as an ethical mandate for a true democracy. He began urging congressmen and senators to adopt the legislation.
The amendment finally
passed in June 1919, and the states ratified it by August 1920.
Specifically, the Nineteenth Amendment prohibited all efforts to deny
the right to vote on the basis of sex. It took effect in time for
American women to vote in the presidential election of 1920.