Great Depression: Turning Point and Recovery
Turning Point and Recovery
In
most countries of the world, recovery from the Great Depression began
in 1933. In the U.S., recovery began in early 1933, but the U.S.
did not return to 1929 GNP for over a decade and still had an
unemployment rate of about 15% in 1940, albeit down from the high of 25%
in 1933.
The overall course of the Depression in the United States, as reflected in per-capita GDP (average income per person) shown in constant year 2000 dollars, plus some of the key events of the period. Dotted red line = long-term trend 1920–1970.
There is no consensus among economists regarding the
motive force for the U.S. economic expansion that continued through most
of the Roosevelt years (and the 1937 recession that interrupted it).
The common view among most economists is that Roosevelt's New Deal
policies either caused or accelerated the recovery, although his
policies were never aggressive enough to bring the economy completely
out of recession.
Some economists have also called attention to the
positive effects from expectations of reflation and rising nominal
interest rates that Roosevelt's words and actions portended. It
was the rollback of those same reflationary policies that led to the
interruption of a recession beginning in late 1937. One
contributing policy that reversed reflation was the Banking Act of 1935,
which effectively raised reserve requirements, causing a monetary
contraction that helped to thwart the recovery. GDP returned to its
upward trend in 1938.
According to Christina Romer, the money
supply growth caused by huge international gold inflows was a crucial
source of the recovery of the United States economy, and that the
economy showed little sign of self-correction. The gold inflows were
partly due to devaluation of the U.S. dollar and partly due to
deterioration of the political situation in Europe. In their book, A
Monetary History of the United States, Milton Friedman and Anna J.
Schwartz also attributed the recovery to monetary factors, and contended
that it was much slowed by poor management of money by the Federal
Reserve System.
Former (2006–2014) Chairman of the Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke agreed that monetary factors played important roles both in the worldwide economic decline and eventual recovery. Bernanke also saw a strong role for institutional factors, particularly the rebuilding and restructuring of the financial system, and pointed out that the Depression should be examined in an international perspective.
Role of Women and Household Economics
Women's
primary role was as housewives; without a steady flow of family income,
their work became much harder in dealing with food and clothing and
medical care. Birthrates fell everywhere, as children were postponed
until families could financially support them. The average birthrate for
14 major countries fell 12% from 19.3 births per thousand population in
1930, to 17.0 in 1935. In Canada, half of Roman Catholic women
defied Church teachings and used contraception to postpone births.
Among
the few women in the labor force, layoffs were less common in the
white-collar jobs and they were typically found in light manufacturing
work. However, there was a widespread demand to limit families to one
paid job, so that wives might lose employment if their husband was
employed. Across Britain, there was a tendency for married
women to join the labor force, competing for part-time jobs
especially.
In France, very slow population growth,
especially in comparison to Germany continued to be a serious issue in
the 1930s. Support for increasing welfare programs during the depression
included a focus on women in the family. The Conseil Supérieur de la
Natalité campaigned for provisions enacted in the Code de la Famille
(1939) that increased state assistance to families with children and
required employers to protect the jobs of fathers, even if they were
immigrants.
In rural and small-town areas, women expanded
their operation of vegetable gardens to include as much food production
as possible. In the United States, agricultural organizations sponsored
programs to teach housewives how to optimize their gardens and to raise
poultry for meat and eggs. Rural women made feed sack dresses and
other items for themselves and their families and homes from feed
sacks. In American cities, African American women quiltmakers
enlarged their activities, promoted collaboration, and trained
neophytes. Quilts were created for practical use from various
inexpensive materials and increased social interaction for women and
promoted camaraderie and personal fulfillment.
Oral history
provides evidence for how housewives in a modern industrial city handled
shortages of money and resources. Often they updated strategies their
mothers used when they were growing up in poor families. Cheap foods
were used, such as soups, beans and noodles. They purchased the cheapest
cuts of meat - sometimes even horse meat - and recycled the Sunday roast
into sandwiches and soups. They sewed and patched clothing, traded with
their neighbors for outgrown items, and made do with colder homes. New
furniture and appliances were postponed until better days. Many women
also worked outside the home, or took boarders, did laundry for trade or
cash, and did sewing for neighbors in exchange for something they could
offer. Extended families used mutual aid – extra food, spare rooms,
repair-work, cash loans – to help cousins and in-laws.
In
Japan, official government policy was deflationary and the opposite of
Keynesian spending. Consequently, the government launched a campaign
across the country to induce households to reduce their consumption,
focusing attention on spending by housewives.
In Germany,
the government tried to reshape private household consumption under the
Four-Year Plan of 1936 to achieve German economic self-sufficiency. The
Nazi women's organizations, other propaganda agencies and the
authorities all attempted to shape such consumption as economic
self-sufficiency was needed to prepare for and to sustain the coming
war. The organizations, propaganda agencies and authorities employed
slogans that called up traditional values of thrift and healthy living.
However, these efforts were only partly successful in changing the
behavior of housewives.
World War II and Recovery
A female factory worker in 1942, Fort Worth, Texas. Women entered the workforce as men were drafted into the armed forces.
The common view among economic historians is that the Great Depression ended with the advent of World War II. Many economists believe that government spending on the war caused or at least accelerated recovery from the Great Depression, though some consider that it did not play a very large role in the recovery, though it did help in reducing unemployment.
The rearmament policies leading up to World War II helped stimulate the economies of Europe in 1937–1939. By 1937, unemployment in Britain had fallen to 1.5 million. The mobilization of manpower following the outbreak of war in 1939 ended unemployment.
When the United States entered the war in 1941, it finally eliminated the last effects from the Great Depression and brought the U.S. unemployment rate down below 10%. In the U.S., massive war spending doubled economic growth rates, either masking the effects of the Depression or essentially ending the Depression. Businessmen ignored the mounting national debt and heavy new taxes, redoubling their efforts for greater output to take advantage of generous government contracts.